عوامل موثر بر تصمیم گیری غیربهینه حسابرسان: نقش عدم تحمل ابهام، فشار بودجه زمانی و شواهد اطلاعاتی
کلمات کلیدی:
ارزش موجودی ها, نقش شواهد, فشار بودجه زمانی, عدم تحمل ابهام, تصمیم گیری غیربهینهچکیده
این تحقیق به بررسی عوامل موثر بر تصمیم گیری غیربهینه حسابرسان در ایران میپردازد و به ویژه به نقش شواهد، فشار بودجه زمانی و عدم تحمل ابهام در این فرآیند توجه میکند. با توجه به اهمیت دیدگاه رفتاری بر اخلاق حسابرسان این مطالعه به تصمیم گیری غیربهینه حسابرسان در مواجهه با عدم تحمل ابهام، فشار بودجه زمانی و شوهد اطلاعاتی میپردازد. روش تحقیق حاضر دارای هدفی کاربردی و از لحاظ شیوه ی جمع آوری دادهها از نوع تحقیقات میدانی است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شرکای حسابرسی، مدیران و سرپرستان حسابرسی شاغل در استان تهران و نمونه آماری تعداد 15 نفر میباشد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان میدهد که شواهد معتبر و کافی به عنوان یکی از ارکان اصلی ارزیابی حسابرسان، تأثیر بسزایی در رفتار اخلاقی موثر بر کیفیت تصمیم گیری آنها دارد. فشار بودجه زمانی یکی دیگر از عواملی است که میتواند کیفیت ارزیابی حسابرسان را تحت تأثیر قرار دهد. در شرایطی که زمان محدود است، حسابرسان مجبور به اتخاذ تصمیمات سریعتری میشوند که ممکن است به رفتار و کیفیت ارزیابی آسیب برساند. این موضوع ضرورت مدیریت مناسب زمان و تخصیص منابع کافی برای فرآیند حسابرسی را نمایان میسازد. عدم تحمل ابهام نیز به عنوان یک عامل روانشناختی میتواند بر فرآیند تصمیمگیری حسابرسان تأثیر بگذارد. در شرایطی که اطلاعات کافی در دسترس نیست یا عدم قطعیت وجود دارد، حسابرسان ممکن است با چالشهایی در ارزیابی ارزش موجودیها مواجه شوند. این امر نشاندهنده اهمیت توسعه تواناییهای حسابرسان در مدیریت ابهام و عدم قطعیت است.
دانلودها
مراجع
Amiruddin, A. (2019). Mediating effect of work stress on the influence of time pressure, work-family conflict and role ambiguity on audit quality reduction behavior. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2017-0223
Amoozad, S., & Hassas Yeganeh, Y. (2020). An Investigation of Factors Influencing Pressures on Auditors and Their Professional (Ethical) Judgments. Quarterly Journal of Financial Accounting Studies, 17(67), 1-26.
Asare, S. K., Trompeter, G. M., & Wright, A. M. (2000). The effect of accountability and time budgets on auditors' testing strategies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(4), 539-560.
Bakhtiari, A., Hejazi, R., & Jerjerzadeh, A. (2021). Identifying Factors Affecting the Psychological Characteristics of Auditors in Auditing Judgment. Journal of Accounting and Management Auditing Knowledge(10), 143-158.
Balkir, I. (2015). Effect of Analytical Review Results, Optimism and Pattern for Coping on Audit Effort of Accounting Estimates Canada].
Bamber, E. M., Snowball, D., & Tubbs, R. M. (1989). Audit structure and its relation to role conflict and role. The Accounting Review, 64(2), 285.
Benjamin, D., Brown, S., & Shapiro, J. (2013). Who is "behavioral"? cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(6), 1231-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12055
Deck, C., & Jahedi, S. (2015). The effect of cognitive load on economic decision making: A survey and new experiments. European Economic Review, 78, 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.004
Delavar, A. (2014). Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences.
Etemadi, H., & Jabari, H. (2008). The Role of Accountability in the Quality of Auditors' Judgment. Quarterly Journal of Financial Accounting Research(18), 105-122.
Fathi, Z., Bahar Moghaddam, M., & Pourheidari, O. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Time Budget Pressure on the Relationship Between Dimensions of Philosophical Mindset and Auditor's Professional Judgment: A Structural Approach. Quarterly Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 18(69), 1-28.
Glover, S. (1997). The influence of time pressure and accountability on auditors' processing of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491361
Golshaian, S. M., Sadat Ghaffari, M., & Seyyedi, S. M. (2020). An Investigation of the Impact of Social Pressures, Commitment, and Personality Traits on Auditors' Judgment. Journal of Accounting and Management Outlook, 3(23), 99-117.
Haeridistia, N., & Fadjarenie, A. (2019). The Effect Of Independence, Professional Ethics Auditor Experience On Audit Quality. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(02).
Heidari, Z., & Mashayekh, S. (2025). The Consequences of Disclosing Key Audit Matters on Investor Judgment and Decision-Making. Empirical Accounting Research, 15(1), 53-84.
Holt, T., & Loraas, T. (2021). A Potential Unintended Consequence of "Big Data": Does Information Structure Lead to Suboptimal Auditor Judgment and Decision-Making? Accounting Horizons.
Kadeh, M., & Ali, S. (2011). The Impact of Qualitative Judgment Characteristics on Auditors' Professional Judgment. Auditor Magazine(42).
Karimabadi, M., Hajiha, Z., Jahangirnia, H., & Gholami Jamkarani, R. (2024). A Model for the Professional Code of Conduct of Independent Auditors Based on a Critical Viewpoint. Judgment and Decision-Making in Accounting, 3(1), 105-123.
Khan Mohammadi, M. H., Gorjizadeh, D., & Fahimi, H. (2017). The Relationship Between Demographic Variables and Audit Quality-Reducing Behaviors. Second International Conference on Management and Accounting, Salehian Institute of Higher Education,
Khosh Tinat, M., & Bostanian, J. (2008). Professional Judgment in Auditing. Quarterly Journal of Financial Accounting Research(18), 25-57.
Malone, C. F., & Roberts, R. W. (1996). Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15(2).
Mascha, M. F., & Miller, C. L. (2010). The effects of task complexity and skill on over/underestimation of internal control. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(8), 734-755. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011069533
Olivia, F., & Ratnawati, K. (2015). the Effect of Work Experiences, Competency, Motivation, Accountability and Objectivity towards Audit Quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.042
Pourmazaheri, M., Khouzin, A., Garkaz, M., & Ma'toufi, A. (2023). The Impact of Auditors' Professional Judgment on Audit Quality with the Mediating Role of Auditors' Professional Resilience. Studies in Ethics and Behavior in Accounting and Auditing, 3(4), 63-80.
Rakhshi, M., Azinfar, K., & Nabavi Chashmi, S. A. (2021). The Existing Pressures and Ethical Dilemmas in the Conflict of Price-Audit Quality. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 13(50), 173-205.
Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wong, C. (2017). Big data analytics: Opportunity or threat for the accounting profession? Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51805
Sepehri, Y., & Pakmaram, A. (2015). Ethical Evaluation and Professional Judgment in Auditing. Second National Conference on Accounting, Management, and Economics of Iran,
Shirowzhan, H., & Fakhari, H. (2024). Clarifying the Decision-Making Mystery: Drivers of Professional Skepticism, Ego Depletion and Overconfidence in Independent Auditors’ Quality of Judgment. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(7), 821-842. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-04-2024-4317
Soleimani, C., Jabbarzadeh Kangarlouei, S., Bahri Saleth, J., & Pakmaram, A. (2020). A Model for Predicting Auditors' Professional Judgment. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 12(48), 179-201.
Sopp, k. (2023). Audit Budget Surrogation: Substituting the Budget for Audit Risk Florida State University Libraries, Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations].
Sweeney, B., & Pierce, B. (2004). Management control in audit firms: a qualitative examination. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 779-812. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410567818
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12, 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.119.2.176
Tat, M. R., Garkaz, M., & Abdoli, M. R. (2022). The Impact of Visual Illusion and Emotional States on Financial Information Analysis and Biased Decision-Making. Studies in Ethics and Behavior in Accounting and Auditing, 2(1), 91-114.
Tsunogaya, N., Sugahara, S., & Chand, P. (2017). The Impact of Social Influence Pressures, Commitment, and Personality on Judgments by Auditors: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting, Research, 16(3), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51761
Wang, P., Yuan, L., & Jie, W. (2017). The joint effects of social identity and institutional pressures on audit quality: The case of the Chinese Audit Industry. International Business Review, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.007
Whitney, P., Rinehart, C. A., & Hinson, J. M. (2008). Framing effects under cognitive load: The role of working memory in risky decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(6), 1179-1184. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1179
Yan, H., & Xie, S. (2016). How does auditors' work sress affect audit quality? Empirical evidence from the Chinese sock market. China Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.001
Yazdi, Z., Bani Mahd, B., & Nikoumaram, H. (2024). The Role of Perceived Pressure on Accountants' Ethical Beliefs in Financial Reporting. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 16(1), 151-185.
Zandi, A. (2024). Presenting a Model to Investigate the Effective Factors on Auditing Performance with a Risk-Based Approach and Independent Audit Quality. Studies in Ethics and Behavior in Accounting and Auditing, 1(4), 81-114.
دانلود
چاپ شده
ارسال
بازنگری
پذیرش
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
حق نشر 2025 Alireza Mollashahi (Author); Mansour Garkaz (Corresponding author); Ali khozain, Alireza Maetoofi (Author)

این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 می باشد.