Peer-Review Process
The journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure the highest quality of published content. Each submitted manuscript is reviewed by at least two to three independent expert reviewers who are specialists in the relevant field. The double-blind nature of the review ensures that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process, promoting impartiality and fairness in the assessment of the manuscript.
Our peer-review process typically follows these steps:
- Initial Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts via the journal’s online submission platform.
- Initial Assessment by Editors: The editorial team evaluates the submission for adherence to the journal’s aims and scope and ensures that it meets the journal’s formatting and ethical standards.
- Peer-Review: Manuscripts that pass the initial assessment are assigned to two or three independent reviewers. The reviewers provide detailed feedback on the manuscript’s quality, originality, methodology, and relevance to the field.
- Decision: Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will make one of the following decisions: accept, accept with minor revisions, request major revisions, or reject.
- Revision and Resubmission: If revisions are requested, the authors are given the opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised manuscript for further review.
- Final Decision: After satisfactory revisions, the manuscript will be accepted for publication.
We strive to complete the peer-review process in a timely manner while ensuring a thorough and fair review for all submissions.
